State government expands shared equity scheme to boost home ownership

0
0
Our target is to take our local communities to the worldwide audience. Submit your story and we will help you to build your audience. Thank you Roots News Team

“Prices in the long term will end up being higher than they otherwise would be. That doesn’t mean prices won’t fall in the short term when interest rates are rising but it does mean higher prices than would otherwise be the case.”

He added there was an open question about whether it was better to consolidate the upcoming federal shared equity scheme with different version run by the states.

Another option the state government should pursue is relaxing planning rules to allow more homes to be built in sought-after areas, he said.

University of Melbourne affordable housing expert Dr Katrina Raynor said she supports shared equity schemes in general, especially when targeted at lower-income earners.

“At $128,000 for an individual you’re not targeting a low-income household,” she said.

“Shared equity, particularly at that scale, is an example of an inflationary housing policy because you’re stimulating demand without stimulating supply.”

Another 7000 places in the shared equity scheme will be made available.

Another 7000 places in the shared equity scheme will be made available.Credit:Eddie Jim

She said it would help young people who did not have access to the Bank of Mum and Dad to achieve home ownership, but did not target households most in need of support.

Ordinarily it made better sense to tie shared equity schemes to new housing supply, but that would not be the best plan in this environment of shortages in building materials and labour.

The announcement comes in the wake of research that found Australian governments spent more than $20.5 billion on first home buyer help in the past decade, often cash grants and stamp duty concessions, which made housing affordability worse by driving up property prices.

Loading

The author of that report, senior research fellow in the City Futures Research Centre at the University of NSW, Dr Chris Martin, said shared equity was “a bit of an advantage” on traditional first home buyer grants.

At least in a shared equity scheme, the government’s contribution is repaid later, he said.

But there would still be a degree of inequality in the housing market because some home owners would have to repay their assistance, while others would be lucky enough to receive gifts from the Bank of Mum and Dad, he said.

“Unless governments are doing something more to restrain house price increases, that problem of rising inequality through the housing system – it’s still a problem,” he said.

“Policy measures that restrain spending on housing by households who already have a position in the system, they’re the things that governments have been less inclined to touch, but they’re the things that would make it less unequal,” he added, citing a broad-based land tax or macroprudential policy to limit investors.

He said the high income caps reflected that the mortgage serviceability requirements would be high for such a purchase.

“We should be more concerned about the very large number of people who don’t have $500 in savings,” he said.

“That reflects where house prices have gone and how far out of reach they are for so many households.”



Source by [author_name]

Our target is to take our local communities to the worldwide audience. Submit your story and we will help you to build your audience. Thank you Roots News Team

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

sixteen + 3 =