Government win on climate legislation leaves Opposition looking like a stranded asset

Our target is to take our local communities to the worldwide audience. Submit your story and we will help you to build your audience. Thank you Roots News Team

Perhaps not since the marriage equality vote has the passage of a bill in the House of Representatives carried such a combination of substantive and symbolic import as the Albanese government’s climate legislation.

While not actually necessary for the implementation of Labor’s policy, Thursday’s vote on the 2030 43 per cent emissions reduction target sent multiple signals.

It marked a hinge-point in Australia’s climate policy, although it would be naïve to see it as the end of our “climate wars”, or to underestimate the challenges of turning the policy into reality.

It sent a crucial message to investors. Without the legislation — which will go through the Senate in September — the encouragement to shyer investors would be that bit weaker.

It showed, in the government’s prior negotiations with the Greens, that Labor would resist pressure from the minor party.

The government rejected their demand for a ban on new coal and gas projects.

However, on Thursday Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek did reject one new venture, announcing she proposed to block a Queensland coal mining project, backed by Clive Palmer, which would have “unacceptable impacts” on the Great Barrier Reef.

Given it was such a signature Labor policy, the climate vote put a stamp of action and delivery on the new government.

And it reinforced the point to the Opposition that it had a massive task ahead in renovating its climate policy into something halfway saleable for the next election.

Peter Dutton’s pre-emptive captain’s call

Indeed, the debate over the legislation has highlighted and exacerbated the bad place the Coalition is in. 

Peter Dutton made a captain’s call in declaring it would vote against the legislation. While most of his colleagues were so inclined, it was a poor precedent for the new leader to pre-empt this week’s party room discussion.

In fact, it would have been better for the Opposition to refrain from a stand, and just wave through the legislation. The government had a clear mandate for this policy, which had been spelled out in detail well before the election.

The Coalition’s opposition has exposed the unhappy position of the much-diminished Liberal moderates.

Albanese smiles as he looks off camera while sitting at the despatch box in the lower house.
The PM taunted the Opposition about “what the business community are saying about them in private”.(ABC News: Matt Roberts)

Tasmanian Liberal Bridget Archer crossed the floor to vote with Labor. Opposition Senate leader Simon Birmingham said if the 43 per cent target had required legislation, then “I would have wanted to vote for it in a heartbeat. However, it doesn’t require legislation.”

This reasoning made no sense.

The Opposition has been left looking like a stranded asset on the climate issue, adrift from a pragmatic business community that wants to promote confidence.

Anthony Albanese relished quoting what he described as “an alphabet soup” of business groups supporting “a vote for certainty”. He hit where hurt when he taunted the Opposition about “what the business community are saying about them in private”.

The government, with a majority in the House of Representatives, did not need any crossbenchers to get its bill through. But, in a gesture, it accepted modest amendments from some of them.

It was a sign of the government’s desire where possible to be inclusive towards the teals (“good manners” as well as “good government”, Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen called it). The teals, incidentally, had met together to discuss their amendments.

A flying start for the government 

The climate vote was the culmination of what was, in legislative terms, a flying start for the government in its first parliamentary fortnight.

Albanese, anxious to reinforce the perception of momentum (that he had first generated on his overseas trips), piled the maximum number of bills into the parliament.

Among them were his aged care reforms that passed both houses. Also on the agenda, as a private member’s bill but facilitated by the government, was the removal of the ban on the ACT and Northern Territory legislating for voluntary assisted dying. This passed the lower house overwhelmingly, with both sides giving a conscience vote. It is set to go through the Senate in September.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.

Play Video. Duration: 4 minutes 48 seconds

The government’s climate change bill passes the lower house.(James Glenday)

While it’s been a happy fortnight for the government on the legislative front, it was punctuated by a darker moment, when Treasurer Jim Chalmers delivered his sombre economic update to the house last week. Followed by Tuesday’s interest rate rise, the government can’t escape that the months ahead will become increasingly tough as cost-of-living increases bite deeply.

Source by [author_name]

Our target is to take our local communities to the worldwide audience. Submit your story and we will help you to build your audience. Thank you Roots News Team


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

5 × 1 =