The community bunfight over fast food in two very different locations


Bendigo councillor Damien Hurrell told the recent council meeting that objectors likely represented a larger number of people who were unhappy about the proposal, and said he agreed with many of their concerns.

“I, personally, recall that for many years I took advantage of various fast food outlets, including McDonald’s, to have a cheeky meal on the way home from work before cooking and eating yet another meal shortly afterwards,” he said. “I have no doubt that [this] habit, amongst others, contributed to significant weight gain and a near diagnosis of type two diabetes for myself.”

Proposed Strathfieldsaye McDonald’s site.

Proposed Strathfieldsaye McDonald’s site.

The subject site is zoned mixed-use. But Hurrell questioned whether a fast food outlet was an appropriate use of the land, which he said was intended to blend small and medium businesses with medium-density residential areas.

Other councillors cited increased traffic, concerns about signage and the continuous operating hours among their reasons for opposing the McDonald’s.

The Victorian government is considering including health and food security in planning provisions – a change recommended in a recent parliamentary inquiry into food security – that would allow councils to decide on fast food development applications on dietary grounds alone.

Strathfieldsaye Primary School council president Alex Forrest welcomed the council’s decision, but said he expected McDonald’s would challenge the refusal at VCAT and pledged to join the council’s defence if necessary.

Councillors in Bendigo raised concerns about McDonald’s signage for its proposed development site in Strathfieldsaye.

Councillors in Bendigo raised concerns about McDonald’s signage for its proposed development site in Strathfieldsaye. Credit: Eamon Gallagher

Strathfieldsaye resident Rob Stephenson, a leading opponent of the development, said the presence of a McDonald’s restaurant and the accompanying increase in traffic might also deter families from riding or walking to school.

He said the councillors had made the right call in rejecting their officers’ recommendation.

“I was happy they considered the range of objections and potential impact the proposed development would have on traffic and therefore the safety of children and other vulnerable road users,” Stephenson said.

A McDonald’s spokeswoman said the company was disappointed with the Bendigo council’s decision, and the proposed site represented an investment exceeding $5 million. She said the mixed-use zone permitted commercial development.

A render of the proposed McDonald’s restaurant for 323 High Street in Northcote.

A render of the proposed McDonald’s restaurant for 323 High Street in Northcote.Credit: Darebin Council Agenda

“We are reviewing our options to pursue this site further,” she said.

In Melbourne, the City of Darebin voted 6-3 against a permit application from McDonald’s to build a 24-hour restaurant on High Street in Northcote. Similar to the Bendigo case, Darebin councillors rejected the advice of council officers and opposed the application during their November meeting.

Thousands of residents also signed a petition against the proposed outlet on the commercial-zoned property.

A McDonald’s spokeswoman said the application met all planning requirements.

“We see strong potential in Northcote and intend to pursue all available avenues to progress this site,” she said.

The disused site on High Street, where a plan to build a McDonald’s has been rejected.

The disused site on High Street, where a plan to build a McDonald’s has been rejected.Credit: Chris Hopkins

Darebin confirmed it would defend its position at VCAT if an appeal were to be lodged.

Planning Institute of Australia Victorian president Patrick Fensham said Victoria’s planning system did not distinguish between types of franchises or specific outlets or restaurants, which meant councillors could not reject applications from fast-food operators because they didn’t like their products.

He said councillors were required to assess development applications purely on planning grounds, including lighting, traffic and appropriate land uses. But Fensham said councils did consider social and environmental impacts when assessing development applications.

“It’s likely that organisations with substantial budgets, like multinational fast food franchises, would pursue their position at appeal vigorously,” he said.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.



Source link

spot_imgspot_img

Subscribe

Related articles

spot_imgspot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

six + seven =