Stacey Warnecke died in September after giving birth at her home.Credit: Instagram
There is an economic dividend to continuity of care as well. Each time costly interventions such as medically unnecessary caesarean sections are avoided, thousands of taxpayer dollars are saved. Research by the college indicates that extending continuity of care to 50 per cent of a hospital’s maternity caseload could save the hospital up to $3.4 million a year, mostly from a reduction in births by caesarean section.
Rates of caesarean section have risen dramatically in Australia due to a multiplicity of complex reasons, some of which do not appear to be related to medical necessity. As of 2023, 41 per cent of births were by caesarean, up from 29 per cent in 2004. According to the World Health Organisation, caesarean rates above 10 per cent do not correlate with reductions in maternal or infant mortality.
Some of this dramatic increase can be explained by women’s changing birth preferences, growing rates of obesity and trends toward older women giving birth, but there is evidence that indicates that caesareans and other birth interventions, particularly in the private system, are also performed for reasons including scheduling, convenience, hospital culture and financial incentives which determine how a doctor or hospital is paid. A recent NSW parliamentary inquiry into birth trauma profiled numerous examples of such claims involving private and public hospitals. Quoting a submission by the organisation Human Rights in Childbirth, the inquiry’s report noted that “women often feel coerced or misled into having an emergency caesarean, only to later discover the procedures were not genuine emergencies”. The inquiry’s report also cited research from Maternity Choices Australia which stated that at least 15 per cent of inductions are “unnecessary”, with one explanation offered for this being “convenience-driven scheduling due to staff shortages”.
Mums’ groups and pregnancy support forums are replete with stories of women whose babies arrived via an unplanned caesarean or other interventions such as episiotomies, forceps or ventouse delivery, for reasons which were not adequately explained to the mother, who did not feel she gave informed consent. The NSW parliamentary inquiry also noted that “a large number of women shared their personal experiences of procedures being performed without proper consent”, referring to this depressingly common occurrence as a form of “obstetric violence”, one of the key drivers of birth trauma.
Loading
It’s estimated that one in three postpartum women in Australia have experienced birth trauma and one in 10 have been subjected to obstetric violence. If it hasn’t happened to you, chances are it has happened to your mum, your sister, a close friend, or someone in your mothers’ group.
There is also a thriving online community catering to expectant mums which fuels an ecosystem of podcasts, substacks, webinars and, yes, questionable mumfluencer content, all dedicated to educating (or promoting misinformation) on pregnancy, birth and parenting. These days the algorithm somehow knows you’re pregnant before even your partner does, and before too long you find yourself absorbing horror stories about birth trauma and obstetric violence while scrolling cures for morning sickness.
This is why the demand for doula services is exploding – women are paying other women to advocate for them during labour when they might not be able to advocate for themselves. The prevalence of obstetric violence and the lottery of rostered doctors and midwives in the hospital system means many pregnant women no longer trust that they will receive the support they need to birth with dignity.
At the extreme end of this sentiment sits the freebirth movement. The risks to mother and baby are in my view unacceptably high. However, it’s possible to understand how a pregnant woman who may have experienced birth trauma or has heard stories of others’ traumatic experiences might be drawn to the idea of birthing within her own home, removed from medical oversight and with it, any unwanted medical interventions.
Both my children entered the world at the hands of an experienced private midwife, someone I had built trust with to guide my labour and advocate for my needs if they were ever to clash with those of the hospital. I had to pay for this service, something I am privileged to have been able to afford.
My private midwife was by my side for my entire pregnancy, birth and early postpartum, checking my baby in utero, facilitating my delivery in a public hospital and monitoring my recovery and my newborn’s development afterwards. All pregnant women deserve this level of personalised medical care. I wish Stacey Warnecke had received it.
Loading
If we want to bring scared or traumatised pregnant women back into the medical system and prevent what happened to Stacey from happening to anyone else, we need to tackle the unacceptable prevalence of birth trauma in Australian hospitals. This means prioritising women’s agency over their own bodies, addressing growing rates of medically unnecessary birth interventions, and expanding access to continuity of care models which are proven to deliver better outcomes. We need to ensure that all Australian mothers have the opportunity to birth with safety, dignity and agency.
Kylie Moore-Gilbert is a regular columnist and the author of memoir The Uncaged Sky: My 804 Days in an Iranian Prison.
The Opinion newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that will challenge, champion and inform your own. Sign up here.
