Baby dreams left on ice over lack of sperm donor ID


“Queensland Health has consistently communicated the government’s approach will focus on education rather than enforcement while Queensland Health explores amendments to address concerns raised by providers,” the spokesperson said.

Loading

Victoria’s Department of Health confirmed it also required all donors to provide identifying information, including a phone number, before any donor material could be used in a fertility treatment.

“From 1 January 2025, assisted reproductive treatment providers in Victoria are not permitted to import and use donor material in their fertility treatments until the required certification is submitted to the Department of Health,” a department spokesman said.

A spokesperson for the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand said it was aware of the issues faced by some Queensland patients since the legislative changes, but did not reveal how widespread they were.

“Issues such as this again highlight the need for a national approach to how we manage assisted reproductive therapies in Australia,” the spokesperson said. “We remain committed to supporting the Queensland government and all governments to improve legislation for the benefit of patients.”

In a letter sent to one Queensland patient, and seen by this masthead, Monash IVF said that as Xytex would not hand over information about her sperm donation, there was no choice but to cease her treatment cycle.

“Our records show that you have embryos created using donor sperm and a donor sperm in storage with Monash IVF where the donor was recruited by Xytex. Monash IVF currently does not have the required information for this donor,” the letter said.

“Recognising the potential legal consequences of the failure to comply with the Act, Monash IVF has made the difficult but necessary decision to cease treatment cycles where the mandated information is not available.”

In its letter Monash IVF blamed the unwillingness of the Queensland regulator to grandfather its new identification record requirements as well as Xytex’s refusing to hand over the phone number and email address information of its donors for the current issues.

“Monash IVF believes that it is very unfair to apply these new requirements retrospectively to material obtained or created prior to legislation coming into effect and recognises the profound and immediate consequences for patients,” the Monash IVF letter states.

Loading

“Monash IVF has contacted Xytex to request the required information from them for the donor on your behalf. Unfortunately, despite several attempts to obtain the required information (including your donor’s phone number and email address) from Xytex, they do not believe they are obliged or authorised to provide the required information.

“Monash has written to the Queensland health minister to highlight this challenging scenario and advocate for patients impacted by the new legislative requirement by asking them to amend the part of the Act. Our communication addresses the financial and psychological impacts for patients unable to use donor material allocated to them and/or their own embryos which they have legally created in good faith.”

The latest issue comes just three weeks after it was revealed an embryo mix-up at a Monash IVF clinic in Queensland resulted in a woman giving birth to a stranger’s baby.



Source link

spot_imgspot_img

Subscribe

Related articles

spot_imgspot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

12 − 1 =